Part 2 - War in the Context of Everything Else
The Bad Seed From Tennessee
In the Part 1 of 'War in the Context of Everything Else', I gave a broad outline of our current status and I set out the premise that unconventional war was declared silently against the American people and that now we need to play catch up. How do I know that unconventional war was declared on us and what's happening is not just cascading snafus by well-meaning but incompetent people? I know because there is evidence of strategic planning. Incompetent people don't strategically plan for the aftermath of their accidental snafus.
The best person to look at for evidence of strategic planning for the economic demise of the United States and the rise of fascism is William E. Brock, the bad seed from Tennessee (unfortunately - not the only one). Following his career is like reading the enemy's playbook. I first became aware of him on the issue 'free trade' that was an engineered economic attack on the American people. The marketing campaign "Free Trade" was a fraud from beginning to end. Then his name showed up again - this time as co-founder of the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) - consolidating political power in the United States in a shadow organization that also foments revolution around the world. Then his name showed up again as a leader of the New Commission on the Skills of the American Workforce after having commissioned the Workforce 2000 report when he was Secretary of Labor and then serving as Chairman of the first Commission on the Skills of the American Workforce (CSAW) - initiating the "Secretary's Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills (SCANS). Out of these "workforce-education" commissions come the plans for the National Human Resource Management System (Tucker letter to Hillary)which is exactly as it sounds. And now I see that he is a Trustee and Counselor for the Center for Strategic & International Studies (CSIS). Their list of Counselors and Trustees reads like the Who's Who of traitors to America.
Creating a "Free Trade" area from Alaska to Tierra del Fuego, Argentina was a goal expressed by Ronald Reagan and William E. Brock was appointed by Reagan to work towards that goal. Brock served as United States Trade Representative from 1981 through 1985.
On the Du Plain website profile of William Brock is not quite complete so I found another profile on Forbes, Inc. Emphasis added:
Liberalizing Services - GATS or BANK Way, 1994
In 1985, Bill Brock was appointed to be the Secretary of Labor where he hired the Hudson Institute to write a report titled, 'Workforce 2000' about globalization, economic policy, trade and technology - setting the stage for the engineered decline of America in the name of corporate growth - the rise of global fascism. The Acknowledgements section of the book recognizes William Brock as "deserving credit" for the report.
"Rebalancing World Growth" Page 9
Being the 'fine suthern gentleman' that he is, William E. Brock III saw the opportunity for the return of the human slave trade and he jumped on it. He left the trail of evidence when he moved from the USTR position to the position of the Secretary of Labor - and then initiated the projects to integrate the American education system with the labor market for "cradle-to-grave" human resource management and then he went into the "body shop" business himself (see links under his picture).
The Human Resource Management System is a supply chain management system for labor for a planned economy. And it won't fly that he didn't know because he left the USTR in 1985 because we know, thanks to Eric Wesselius of the Transnational Institute 2002 report, "Behind GATS 2000: Corporate Power at Work" plus in his bio at the Du Plain Speakers bureau (above), it says he is considered the principal "father of the Uruguay Round" that the plans for the inclusion of flesh trade - "Trade in Services" began in 1981 when William Brock was first appointed to be the United States Trade Representative.
US Coalition of Service Industries:
Godfathers of GATS
The US Coalition of Service Industries (USCSI) is undoubtedly the most influential services lobby group in the world. Its origins date back to the mid-1970s. At that time, US financial services companies American International Group (AIG), American Express and Citicorp wanted to improve their access to what were at that time heavily regulated markets outside the US. They considered the inclusion of ‘trade in services’ in the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT, the WTO precursor) as a good tool with which to force open these markets.
In 1981, the chief executive officers of AIG, American Express and Citicorp concluded that there was a need to form a broader business coalition to push the demand to include ‘trade in services’ in the GATT agenda. They mandated American Express Vice-President Harry Freeman to form a coalition of services industries that would reach well beyond New York financial circles. In 1982, the US Coalition of Service Industries (USCSI) was officially launched under Freeman’s chairmanship.
Between 1982 and 1985, USCSI worked closely with the US Trade Representative (USTR) and the Department of Commerce to place services firmly on the global trade agenda. In late 1983, the USTR submitted a report to the GATT on the growing importance of services in the world economy, summarising existing international rules governing trade in services and suggesting possible approaches to a new regime. When the GATT Uruguay Round was launched at the September 1986 Punta del Este GATT Ministerial Conference, a Group on Negotiations on Services (GNS) was formed and negotiations formally started on a multilateral regime for trade in services within the GATT. (Page 6)
What the "Trade in Services" provisions in the GATS agreement failed to do - intentionally - was to distinguish between the 'Service Business' and the people who are hired to work in 'service businesses'. The people were considered as products - commodities for trade - as if all 'service businesses' were body shops - human body shops.
And because the intent of "Free Trade" was to invest in the foreign country and "Ship Back In", the international trading system became a mechanism to subvert and break down our immigration laws and by definition, our national identity, culture and social norms. I would also call your attention "applies to government" in the above figure which explains why we would have somebody like Wen Ho Lee working at a National Laboratory in a position that requires a security clearance. And if you do some research on NIH and other national research labs, you'll find mostly foreign names - imported "human products" in positions that give them access to materials and knowledge that could do us all great harm - think anthrax; think small pox; use your imagination at what access they might have at the National Research Laboratories and what even one of them having malevolent intent could do.
Also factor in, the affirmative action and non-discrimination laws that were on the books to aid American Blacks, native Americans and other minorities. Those laws allow imported "service providers" to use the benefits that were intended only for Americans. What these laws are doing is enabling a reversal of fortunes in which the American people are put at a disadvantage to the "global majority" minority on our shores.
On March 7, 2007, the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions held a hearing titled, "Strengthening American Competitiveness for the 21st Century in which Bill Gates was the only witness. He was there to testify that the U.S. system of issuing visas for imported workers was hampering the ability of U.S. corporations to "compete" and that the visa system should be eliminated and corporations should be allowed an unlimited ability to import human commodities.
The following is an excerpt from the transcript of that hearing. Both the transcript and the video of the hearing are available on the Committee website:
Questioner is Senator Allard:
Let me quickly go into another subject. Mary Robinson, President of Ireland, head of the World Health Organization, met with a number of us. She's very concerned about just this brain drain to the United States, particularly in health, in health professions. She pointed out that the flow, for example, at a time when we have eight or nine applications for every nursing slot in my State of Massachusetts at community colleges, we can get one applicant that can take it, because we don't have the training facilities, we don't have the professors for the training of nurses. And we're considering an amendment on the floor now on the homeland security bill to increase the number of nurses on this.
Now, here are some of the countries. Nigeria, we have 2,500 doctors here from Nigeria, and 8,900 nurses. From South Africa, we have 1,950 doctors, 877 nurses. In Kenya, HIV rate, 15 percent, 865 doctors, 765 nurses. Ghana, HIV rate, doctors, 850, 2,100 nurses on this. Her point was, they--many of these countries around the world, so many of these doctors and the nurses, health professionals that are so vital, in terms-- trying to deal with the challenges of healthcare, are here in the United States--are coming to the United States, working in the United States. This is costing these countries--they're training these people. It's an outlay for--training them. How do we balance this, versus what you've said about, sort of, the openendedness, in terms of having skilled people be able to come into the United States? What's really the--where do we--where do we really begin to draw the line? When do we say, ``Well, we're going to try and invest more to develop more opportunities for Americans to become nurses, Americans to become the doctors of''--we have qualified people that don't get into our great medical schools or to our nursing. But what's the balance in there?
Mr. Gates. Well, the--when foreign labor comes to the United States, there's this incredible benefit to the country that they come from of the remittances they send back to the country. And that's a huge thing, in terms of bootstrapping those economies, letting them send kids back there to school, and having the right nutrition, and great things. So, I don't think the right answer is to restrict that ability to come and earn a high wage and have that go into the economy that they came from.
Clearly when you get shortages like that, the systems like the community college system are usually quite responsive in creating capacity and meeting that demand. I'm not an expert on the nurse situation in----
Setting aside the horror of the situation in which we find ourselves for a moment (I'll get back to it), the reason for a "trade management system" for human commodities becomes apparent. The "trade management system" is the "Human Resources Management" system as described by Marc Tucker of the NCEE to Hillary Clinton in a letter written in 1992 and published in the Congressional Record by Colorado Representative Bob Schaffer in 1998.
Excerpt from Tucker's Letter to Hillary:
The client for this system is not the workers or the students. It's the employers.
A more formalized description of the *National* Human Resource Management System can be found HERE. Keep in mind that William Brock is co-director with Marc Tucker on the New Commission on the Skills of the American Workforce and he initiated the original project to justify it - and to design it.
The fact that this situation was created through international trade agreements designed for the benefit of multinational corporations and the design of the "Human Resource Management" system was well underway before the Uruguay Round of trade was voted on by Congress proves strategic planning for the covert economic attack on American citizens - to flood the U.S. labor market with imported human commodities and to enslave all in a system of electronic manacles and control of life's economic opportunities for America's children. The development and full implementation of this computer system will serve as the *national* 'Trade/Human Resource Management" System.
In 1988, legislation was passed to provide for the national collection of education data. As with most government programs, initially participation was voluntary ultimately becoming mandatory.
Several years ago, a copy of the 1997 NCES Data Dictionary (Basic Data Elements) education data was located. The Foreword of this document says the following:
What you'll see in that document is that the data being collected by the federal government on America's children is individualized and highly personal. In 2001, there was an update to the NCES Data Dictionary. Just a look at the table of contents is enough to show the direction the *National* Human Resource Management System - under the heading of "education" is taking. See page 20 - Work Experience - in-school and post-school.
Secretary's Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills (SCANS)
The Work Force 2000 report commissioned by William Brock, was authored by William E. Johnston who was the Project Director. The co-author was Arnold E. Packer. A couple of years ago on the 'National Research Center for Career and Technical Education website, there was an article written by Arnold E. Packer titled, "Implementing SCANS". It describes the history and purpose of the SCANS project. The fact that it was found on a vocational education website should not be lost. Also, it was retrieved from the Internet Archive.
Another document was retrieved that was separate - but also had Arnold E. Packer's name on it. It was the project at Johns-Hopkins University where they attempted to define the skill set for all jobs. The purpose of defining the skill sets is because it is required for computerized matching of candidate qualifications to job requirements listed online.
In 1991, The Labor Department published a report titled, "What Work Requires of Schools" that describes the employer requirements for "working skills" that they planned to incorporate into the K-12 curriculum once the SCANS system was implemented. It's in this document and the following documents that you can see the transformation of our system of education into a supply chain management system for labor.
In 1992, the Labor Department published a formal report titled, "Learning a Living: Blueprint for High Performance". This report described the changes to the education system that would be required for the integrated school-workforce system which together become the *National* "Human Resource Management System".
Also in 1992, Douglas D. Nobel wrote a paper about the changes taking place in the education system. The title of his paper was 'New American Schools for the New World Order'. He begins the paper with: - The New American Schools Development Corporation (NASDC) was established in 1991 by President George Bush to funnel corporate funds into innovative designs for "new American schools".
The design was already done as defined in Marc Tucker's letter to Hillary. Besides providing a funnel for money, another report titled, "Skills for a New Century: A Blueprint for Lifelong Learning" details corporate commitments for participation in the project.
In 1993, Al Gore began a project to redesign the American government. Conceptually, the way to visualize the magnitude of that is to envision the United States as just one large corporation with the Internet being the corporate computer system. The *National* "Human Resource Management System" one of the USA, Inc. systems. Corporate computer systems are management and control systems so by definition, when they started combining the departments and functions of government, they were in effect, making American citizens, their children and their personal assets - all assets to be managed by USA, Inc.
One component of the Human Resource System is 'America's Talent Bank - which is actually the networked state education databases on American children as well as adults registered in the State Workforce Systems (used to be called unemployment systems).
When I first began researching
the National Human Resource Management System, America's Job
Bank was an active website. At some point, when I was
checking links, I found that it was no longer active.
Because this piece of the system is critical to
understanding the scope of the NHRMS system, I recovered the
webpages and followed the "forwarding address" links and
captured those pages. Because this system is about as
unAmerican as it gets, it is this writer's opinion that they
were going underground - hiding behind the facade of
private, non-profit headhunters. The captured pages
were placed into a pdf which can be viewed by clicking on
the hyperlink for American's Job Bank below.
The following is an excerpt from the the captured About Us page from America's Job Bank:
|In 1995, the Idaho Board of Education applied for a grant to implement the National Human Resource Management system in Idaho. The reference in the letter to "seamless web" ties right back to Marc Tucker's description of the system in his letter to Hillary Clinton. Just replace the name Idaho with your state name because this is a national system so at the detail level, it is the same for all states.|
HERE to read the entire letter. The diagram
following is on Page 3 of the pdf.
The next document is the 'vision' of Idaho's Education-Workforce Development system which is synonymous with the National Human Resource Management System. [Note that there will be an error message saying that it can't find a font. Just click ok because it doesn't need the font for you to read the letter.]
The following is an excerpt from that document:
The importance of this computer system to lock up and manage the U.S. Labor Market cannot be overstated because it was not only designed to manage the U.S. Labor Market, it was designed to act as a human commodity, trade management system providing for foreign worker access to American jobs.
As I was writing - or just after I finished researching the education system to see if Marc Tucker's vision for a National Human Resource Management (NHRM) system was in fact, being implemented, Congressman Tom Tancredo introduced legislation titled, "Rewarding Employers that Abide by the Law and Guaranteeing Uniform Enforcement to Stop Terrorism Act of 2005" or "REAL GUEST Act of 2005". Very clever name. It was providence that I knew about the NHRM System so that I knew how Tom Tancredo's Guest Worker program fit into the picture.
Excerpt from 2005, H.R. 3333. [Note: The text of this legislation should still be available on THOMAS, the Congressional legislative information system.]
The significance of those last two highlighted items will become clear in Part 3 of 'War in the Context of Everything Else'