The State of Colo-Racket and The Toll
Road
This is an update on my on-going saga
with the Colorado Public Highway AUTHORITY concerning their toll roads electronic billing system. I have been derelict in the timeliness of
my response because I've had to wrestle with my conscious. Do I owe this
money or not? If I owe it, then I should pay it - but do I have an
obligation to pay when I didn't agree to pay anything and the charges that I
allegedly owe were incurred by ambush. I made my absolute decision not to
pay it when I received a letter from the office of Linebarger, Googan, Blair &
Sampson, LLP., telling me that an additional charge of $20.00 has been added to
the electronic toll billing bringing the original $9.45 bill to a total of
$34.45.
Here's the story. After
I posted my Travel
Advisory - Colorado Toll Road Racket,
OK-SAFE picked up the story and
wrote an article about it because I traveled through Colorado to go to the
Researcher's Conference in Tulsa sponsored by OK-SAFE and because toll roads in
general are an issue because of the privatization of our highways (ISTEA
of 1991 legislation), George H.W. Walker's unconstitutional
Executive Order 12803 ordering the sell-off of national infrastructure
assets and the plans for the Trans-Texas
Corridor which were for the road to become a toll road operated by the
Spanish company Cintra.
In my original letter to the
Colorado Public Highway Authority, I told them I was going to issue a travel
advisory about the Colorado Toll Road ambush on my website. The CPHA
apparently did a search and found the article that was posted on OK-SAFE's
website because I received a letter from Dave Kristick, Deputy Executive
Director referring to it along with pictures of the toll road, a map of the
highway system, etc. The following are links to the letter and the
enclosures sent to me by Dave Kristick:
Letter
from Dave Kristick, Deputy Executive Director, Colorado Public Highway
Authority (CPHA)
CPHA Toll Road Map
CPHA Toll Road Info
Photos of Toll
Road signs according to Dave Kristick. There is only one sign that I
can assume I know the placement of - and that's only because of the Google
satellite images of the highway system that I captured (see below).
The following is the letter I just wrote to Dave
Kristick with a CC to the law firm.
| |
 |
 |
Dave Kristick, Deputy Executive Director
Public Highway Authority
P.O. Box 5470
Denver, CO 80217-5470
RE: Response to your letter to me dated September 17, 2012
concerning toll road charges
Dear Mr. Kristick,
Thank you for the photos and the information about your
electronic ambush system – especially for the map. I don’t see
the picture of my license plate. Nor do I see a photo of the
precise location where I entered the toll road. That location
would have to be an exit from the Interstate, I-25. But
regardless, from the photos you did send, I recognize the
highway. Your surveillance system should have picked up the fact
that I pulled over to the side of the road to check the map to
see where I was because it seemed to me that I was headed out
towards the boondocks because there was very little traffic on
the road. I now understand why the road is virtually deserted.
Enclosed you will find 7 satellite images showing
Interstate 25 from Fort Collins which apparently turns into
Highway 87 through Denver and which has an exit only lane to
your toll road. It should be noted that these images are from
Google Earth and they are static. They show the roadway only and
not the real time traffic. At the time I was on I-25, the
traffic was fast moving but very heavy. What these maps
show is that if a driver inadvertently is in the exit only lane
at the split, they are stuck with no way to avoid the toll road
ambush.
I just received a letter from your attorneys Linebarger, Goggan,
Blair & Sampson, LLP., notifying me that another $20.00 has been
added to charges – bringing the original amount of $9.45 to
$34.45 with a threat to add more if I don’t pay up. The letter
included the Colorado law that allows you to do this along with
the information that I can request a hearing but doing so could
possibly add additional costs plus the non-renewal of my vehicle
registration.
Your contract is with the State of Colorado and the citizens of
Colorado. I am not a party to your contract and I am not bound
by it’s terms as it pertains to electronic billing for toll
roads. For the record, it is against the law to provide material
support to a criminal racket and the State of Colorado
Transportation Department is clearly running a racket. If the
citizens of Colorado are stupid enough to allow their government
to restrict their right to travel by privatizing highways and
contracting with private-for profit corporations to manage those
roadways, then they can drown in the charges and live under the
tyranny of the racketeers but those chains do not extend to
out-of-state travelers through your state unless they explicitly
consent to the toll road charges.
I’ve enclosed a picture of Checkpoint Charlie. I suggest that
you set one up at each of your major roadways where unsuspecting
out-of-state travelers enter your state so you can get them to
sign a contract agreeing to pay your outrageous charges for
traveling. You can be assured, that I will NEVER again enter the
State of Colo-Rackets.
Sincerely,
Vicky L. Davis
145 Avenida Del Rio
Twin Falls, ID 83301
CC: Linebarger, Goggan, Blair & Sampson, LLP
Enclosures:
Google Map 1
Google Map 2
Google Map 3
Google Map 4
Google Map 5
Google Map 6
Google Map 7
Picture: Checkpoint Charlie
|
 |
 |
|
|
The following are links to the maps online
Google Map 1
Google Map 2
Google Map 3
Google Map 4
Google Map 5
Google Map 6
Google Map 7
Checkpoint Charlie: An
idea for Colo-Racket

Vicky Davis
October 20, 2012
P.S. Colorado is also contracting with - or are on
the verge of contracting with the Spanish firm Cintra. I found the
following on the Colo-Racket,
High Performance Transportation Enterprise webpage:
US 36 Managed
Lanes Toll Concession Project Shortlist Announced:
The Colorado High
Performance Transportation Enterprise (HPTE) has
shortlisted three of the industry teams that
responded to the Request for Qualifications (RFQ)
released for the US 36 Managed Lanes Toll Concession
Project. The shortlisted teams are (in alphabetical
order):
- Denver Access Partners,
including Cintra Infraestructuras, S.A.,
Ferrovial Agroman US Corp., Lawrence
Construction Company, and AZTEC Engineering
Group, Inc.
- Plenary Roads Denver,
including The Plenary Group, Ames Construction,
Inc., Granite Construction , HDR, Transfield
Services and Goldman Sachs.
- US 36 Development
Partners, including Isolux Corsán, Terracare
Associates, Atkins, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ,
and THB Advisory.
A draft Request for
Proposals (RFP) was released on July 10, 2012. A
final RFP will be issued on November 9, and
proposals are due on January 4, 2013. A preferred
proposer will be selected on February 8, 2013.
|
----------------------------
Goldman Sachs? Of course they would be
involved. 'Foreign Direct Investment' selling
America out from under us.
Stay tuned for my next post that will include some
background history on Colo-Racket's leading the way towards New World Order
treason.